The DSK Principle: If you rape, sexually assault, force yourself sexually on a woman, whatever you call it, hire the most expensive lawyers in New York and pay newspaper journos to dig up and print unverified dirt on the accuser via the ‘Murdoch’ method.
Oh, and then ask all your wealthy Jewish friends to “help me out here”.
Once again money and power over-rides the abuse of a woman who does not have the connections or wealth to defend herself. Talk about a ‘David and Goliath’ situation.
I can only think about the shame and humiliation this young woman has had to deal with. I hope she has a support network around her because she is dealing with some of the most powerful and wealthy men in the world, not only DSK as you will see below.
The sordid story of Murdoch ‘hacking’ journos may in the end help the hotel maid who has accused Strauss-Kahn of sexual assault. We hope!
The New York Post defamatory story about the hotel maid, which rapidly spread globally, has come unstuck. And she needs all the help she can get, because it is going to be a rougher ride than it has been so far for her. If the New York prosecutor goes ahead and drops the case against DSK because of the “unreliability” of the accuser, given what has since come to light, world-wide condemnation will surely ensue. “A source close to the defence” supposedly “leaked” the information to the NY Post. Sound familiar? The further accusation by the Post that the maid was hired through “her Union” who also arranged “clients” for her is also a complete fabrication. Legal sources say the maid’s attempt to sue the Post for defamation, wont go ahead because she cannot prove she had a reputation to be ruined in the first place! But she has feelings, she has to find work in the future. Surely she has lost just as much in her world as DSK has lost in his ?
Serious doubts also have been cast about a “disreputable drug dealer” whom the maid was ‘phone tapped’ talking to; bragging about how much money she was going to get from DSK.
Erik Wemple writes:
The “defence source” coughed up two key details:
1) That the accuser did special favors for male guests at the Sofitel Hotel and received compensation in return;
2) That her union had placed her there because it knew she would “bring in big bucks.”
After floating that second allegation, the New York Post wrote nearly 30 paragraphs of copy blasting the accuser from various angles. Then it dropped in a denial of the union claim. “These allegations are absurd,” the paper quoted spokesman Josh Gold as saying. “She never registered at our hiring hall. We never sent her for a single interview. We absolutely did not place her at the hotel and we do not track tips.”
To use the paper’s own language, this “stunning new info”casts doubts on whether the woman was a “hooker,” “working girl,” not to mention a “scam artist.”
The hotel manager, who reviewed the woman he subsequently hired, checked boxes on the evaluation form alongside “Speaks well, expresses ideas adequately” & “Sincere desire to work” & “Likeable.” On the “overall impression,” the applicant scored a “very good.”
It gets worse though, so read on:
Abigail R Esman is the source for the article below:
DSK And The Billionaire Art Dealer Connection: Conspiracy Or Coincidence?
Two French men, both Jewish, both powerful, both wealthy, both part of the art elite, both with strong ties to the United States, one a friend of French president Nicolas Sarkozy, the other a potential rival – and both in trouble with the law, in America and in France. It’s enough to wag even the most apathetic of tongues, and it is, especially in Paris, where some claim both cases smack of anti-Semitism and political conspiracy, while others call it a cautionary tale about the arrogance of power.
This past week, while Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the former head of the International Monetary Fund, celebrated the near-collapse of the case against him for alleged rape of a chambermaid at New York’s Sofitel hotel, Guy Wildenstein, scion of the Wildenstein art dynasty, was charged with possession of stolen property and fraud. For Wildenstein, the charges are the latest in a series of criminal investigations and lawsuits that have followed him over the past six years, in which numerous works of art have been seized from the family holdings, which some estimate to be worth $4-5 billion, and possibly even more. Both Strauss-Kahn and Wildenstein are Jewish. Both have homes in the USA and Paris. But where Strauss-Kahn was a strong contender to oppose Sarkozy in the 2012 French Presidential elections, Wildenstein is a close friend of Sarkozy and a founding member of his political party, the UMP.
But the connections don’t stop there. DSK’s wife, the American-born journalist Anne Sinclair, is also the granddaughter of legendary Paris art dealer Paul Rosenberg, who – back in the day — worked closely with Wildenstein’s own grandfather, Georges. (The Wildenstein art dynasty extends back five generations with the founding of the Wildenstein Gallery in Paris in the 1870s.) The two galleries – Rosenberg and Wildenstein – were among the world’s most powerful during the early-to-mid 20th-century, and together represented the works of Pablo Picasso. Sinclair’s art collection, inherited from her mother, is to some extent shrouded in secrecy; and while the contents of the collection are not entirely known, ArtInfo.com estimates its worth at “tens of millions of euros.” (In truth, it may well be worth significantly more than that, given the number of Picasso works alone – possibly reaching into the billions, or near it.)
Now, here’s where the story gets tricky. ArtInfo also reports that “Much of Paul Rosenberg’s collection was looted by the Nazis, and, though the family has obtained restitution for several works, it is thought that many more have not been returned to their rightful owners.” Match this with the fact that, along with the lawsuits and criminal investigations plaguing Wildenstein, some Jewish families allege that the Wildensteins – though Jewish themselves – cooperated with Nazi officials from time to time. And many of the lawsuits against Guy Wildenstein have been filed by the families and descendants of French Jews, who contend that works left in the care of the Wildenstein family for safekeeping during WWII still remain in the Wildenstein vaults. In January of this year, French police raided the Wildenstein Institute in Paris, seizing various works by Edgar Degas, Berthe Morisot, and others, which Jewish families and others claim were stolen (or at least, should have been returned to them, and were not). Were any of these works once in the Rosenberg collection? Are they part of what should have been Sinclair’s inheritance?
Anne Sinclair’s name has not come up in any of the investigations or lawsuits surrounding the Wildenstein affair. But it is certain that she knows — and is likely friends with – other wealthy, (Jewish) French families who are involved, especially the Rouarts — descendants of collector Anne-Marie Rouart — who are leading the investigation. (Writer Jean-Marie Rouart, for instance, a well-known figure in literary and intellectual circles, is also a descendant of the painters Berthe Morisot and Henri Rouart, who exhibited at the Rosenberg gallery). According to the New York Times, Anne-Marie’s nephew and heir, Yves, says that some 40 art works were “removed from the walls during the settlement of her estate.” One of the executors of that estate was Guy Wildenstein.
Consequently, Wildenstein – or any of his allies – might perhaps believe that Sinclair, given both her social and political positions, pushed the matter, encouraging the inquiries into Wildenstein’s financial records (he is also under investigation for tax evasion), his father’s estate (for which he was sued by his late stepmother, Sylvia Roth Wildenstein), and the alleged theft of paintings left in his father’s and grandfather’s care. Obviously, this is all purely speculative, but given the politics here – one man an ally of Sarkozy, the other a potential threat to his political future – it’s something I couldn’t help but wonder. Has this entire mess – both the DKS and Wildenstein cases — been the result of a political tit-for-tat?
Or is it all, as some maintain, yet another illustration of the insidious anti-Semitism that pervades French society, one which a friend described as motivated by “people on the far right who do not want to see a Jewish president, who think a Jewish cabal runs politics and cinema and the art world, and are prepared to do anything to bring them down”?
Or none of the above?
As the DSK and Wildenstein stories developed over the past few days – and with the latest charges against Strauss-Kahn brought by French journalist Tristane Banon — I’ve been Googling a lot. I’ve been, in fact, Googling obsessively. I now sit among piles of paper with, in the words of Arlo Guthrie, “circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one explaining what each one” is.
The entire pile offers no real answers, but it does present a pretty fascinating picture. As for the charges of anti-Semitism, one has to take that with a shake of proverbial salt, especially given the fact that Banon herself is Jewish – or at least, is the daughter of two Jews, one of Iranian origin (her mother) and the other Moroccan (her father). Then again, her father, with whom she is estranged, once worked for Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. On the other hand, her mother, Anne Mansouret, registered to run in the 2011 presidential elections against Sarkozy — in DSK’s own party, the Socialists, making them potential political rivals. She withdrew her name – which she claimed only to have entered as a “symbolic gesture” — on July 1 – just days before her daughter filed her complaint against DSK for attempted rape.
Summary: So far I’ve got Banon, whose half-sister – the daughter of her godmother – is married to a (Tunisian-born) member of Sarkozy’s cabinet, and Sarkozy who is friends with Guy Wildenstein, whose family used to be connected to the family of DSK’s current wife, and who is in court with the Rouarts and Sylvia Wildenstein’s estate, which also sued Sarkozy, who may or may not have had anything to do with the DSK situation in NY and may or may not have anything to do with Banon’s accusations against DSK even if she is half sisters with the wife of a Sarkozy cabinet member and who is also the daughter of her godmother, who was at one time married to her father – and to DSK.
Seriously. It’s hard to believe any of this is real. This is stuff for HBO. No one, not even Thomas Hardy, could invent anything this intricate. Stay tuned for the movie, probably coming soon.
Wow! This Goliath is gigantic! I don’t suppose this brave maid has any idea of what she is up against!
See my previous posts: Strauss-Kahn & Sarkozy